Heydrick's Appeals
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Arre at, of Charles Heydrick, surviving executor of the will of Samuel Heydrick deceased, from the decree of the Orphans’ Court of Montgomery county: Of January Term 1885, No. 46, and— Arpe at, of Charles Heydrick, administrator of the estate of Leanna Heydrick, deceased, from the decree of the Orphans’ Court of Montgomery County: Of January Term 1885, No. 47. These two appeals were argued together and arose upon the settlement of the account of Charles Heydrick, surviving…
Read the full summary
Arre at, of Charles Heydrick, surviving executor of the will of Samuel Heydrick deceased, from the decree of the Orphans’ Court of Montgomery county: Of January Term 1885, No. 46, and— Arpe at, of Charles Heydrick, administrator of the estate of Leanna Heydrick, deceased, from the decree of the Orphans’ Court of Montgomery County: Of January Term 1885, No. 47. These two appeals were argued together and arose upon the settlement of the account of Charles Heydrick, surviving •executor of the last will of Samuel Heydrick, deceased, and of the account of said Charles Heydrick, administrator of…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Paxson
APPEAL OF CHARLES HEYDRICK, SURVIVING EXECUTOR OF SAMUEL HEYDRICK, DECEASED.
The court below was clearly right in holding that the appellant was an incompetent witness. It is true he was not a devisee, legatee or creditor of the estate of either Samuel Heydrick or Leanna Heydrick; of the first estate he is the executor, of the other the administrator; lie is a trustee and has no interest in either estate. But he seeks to relieve himself from liability to the estate of Samuel Heydrick for a sum of money which by his account as executor, filed and confirmed, he has thus solemnly admitted to be…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Babbitt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
- Naugle's Estate (No. 1)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923