Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Paul
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant, Francis Paul, M.D., appeals as of right from an order granting summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116 (0(10) in favor of plaintiff, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan, on its breach of contract claim. The trial court held that since defendant did not have the requisite certificate of need (con), as required in the subscriber contract, the contract with bcbsm was breached. Plaintiff was awarded a judgment of $16,273.55, that being the balance of overpayment to defendant from bcbsm between March 1, 1982, and June 30, 1984. Defendant appeals, raising three issues.
First,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Boston Piano & Music Co. v. Pontiac Clothing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Van Tassel v. McDonald Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Acme Cut Stone Co. v. New Center Development Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Culver v. CastroMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.