Legal Opinion
In Re Rembrandt Technologies, Lp, Patent Lit.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided June 18, 2007No. 1848PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRANSFER ORDER
WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman.
This litigation presently consists of the fifteen actions listed on Schedule A and pending in three districts as follows: seven actions in the Eastern District of Texas, six actions in the District of Delaware, and two actions in the Southern District of New York. Before the Panel is a motion, brought by CoxCom, Inc., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, seeking centralization of all actions in the District of Delaware. The owner of the patents, Rembrandt Technologies, LP (Rembrandt), opposes centralization but, alternatively, suggests transfer to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Smith Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
- In Re Acacia Media Technologies Corp. Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2005
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rembrandt Techs., LP v. Comcast of Fla./Pa., LP (In Re Rembrandt Techs. LP)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- In re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In re Bear Creek Technologies, Inc., ('722) Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- Uber Technologies, Inc. v. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- In Re Rembrandt Techs., Lp Patent Litig.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.