Legal Opinion

People v. Bowles

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1929No. Docket No. 1824PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAHN, J., pro tem.

The defendant was charged by information filed by the district attorney of Riverside County with the crime commonly known as “issuing a bank check Avithout sufficient funds.” The information also charged the defendant with having suffered two prior conAÚctions of felonies. A plea of not guilty was entered to the check charge. As to the charges of prior convictions, the defendant asserted that they were untrue.

The jury returned a verdict, of guilty as to the check charge and found that each of the prior convictions charged was true.

It appears without conflict that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CortzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. People v. BowlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. People v. CroxtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API