Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Estate of Galaske

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 11, 1989No. 6577PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action seeking an injunction and specific performance on a lease agreement, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for the defendants. The plaintiffs’ claims of error involve the trial court’s interpretation of the lease agreement which implicate the factfinding function of the trial court. We will not retry *824the case. It is well established that the intention of the parties as to their contractual obligations is a question of fact and as such, we will not reverse the findings of the trial court unless we find they are clearly erroneous. Gallicchio Bros., Inc. v.C & S Oil Co., 191 Conn.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gallicchio Bros., Inc. v. C & S OIL CO.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Branigan v. CohenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rokalor, Inc. v. Connecticut Eating Enterprises, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  2. Elliott v. StaronConnecticut Superior Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API