Minock v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.

The plaintiff, a married woman, residing at . Detroit, took defendant’s evening train for Holly. A short distance east of .Holly, defendant’s track ip crossed by the Flint & Pere Marquette railroad. It appears from the proof that, immediately after leaving each station, the brakeman or conductor announced the next station at which the train would stop. Holly was so announced. The plaintiff testified:

“After we left Davisburg, he said the next station would be Holly.

“ Q. Did he say ‘the next station,’ or ‘the next stop?’

“A. ‘The next station;’ he did not say ‘stop’ at all.”

The train stopped…