Legal Opinion

Baird v. Union Mutual Life Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1919No. 20529PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: P. James •Cosgraye, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMorrissey, C. J.

Action to recover on a tontine life insurance policy. The amount in dispute is $1,439.55, being the difference between the sum claimed by plaintiff from the surplus under a “rider” or slip attached to the policy and the amount found due by the company’s actuary on the policy without the rider. The item of $2,579.25 payable from the reserve is not in dispute. There was judgment for plaintiff for the full amount, and defendant appeals.

What is the contract between the parties! November 17, 1896, plaintiff made application to defendant for a policy in the sum of $5,000 under the tontine plan,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kaley v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Halliday v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. McCrary v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. New York Life Ins. Co. v. McCrearyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Baird v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Adams v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API