Legal Opinion

Wilen v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 18, 2008No. A08A0206PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Following a bench trial, Joseph Wilen appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Dr. Richard G. Murray, an expert witness retained by Wilen’s attorney in a previous lawsuit. In this appeal, Wilen contends that he is not responsible for Dr. Murray’s expert witness fees because he did not enter into a direct contract with Dr. Murray. He also asserts that the trial court erred by awarding attorney fees under OCGA § 13-6-11. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

The court is the trier of fact in a bench trial, and its findings will be upheld on appeal if there…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brumbelow v. Northern Propane Gas Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. King Industrial Realty, Inc. v. RichCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Z & Y Corp. v. Indore C. Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Brady v. SappingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nash v. StuddardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Champion Windows of Chattanooga, LLC v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. Meunier Carlin & Curfman, LLC v. Scidera, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
  4. First American Title Insurance Company v. Dj Mortgage, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Champion Windows of Chattanooga, LLC v. Joanne EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API