Bailey v. Edmundson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Writ op error, to reverse a judgment of the Superior Court rendered in an action of tort by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.
The defendant in error pleaded in nullo est erratum. The case was heard by a single justice of this court, who affirmed the judgment of the Superior Court, and the defendant in error appealed to the full court. But on filing the plea, the case should immediately have been transferred to the full court, as the plea raises only issues of law. Pub. Sts. e. 150, § 7. Tufts v. Newton, 119 Mass. 476.
The error assigned is that the judgment of the Superior Court was rendered upon the default of the original defendant, now the plaintiff in error, within four legal days after the default. It appears…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dudley v. KeithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- President of the Portland Bank v. President of the Maine BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Hosmer v. HoittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Norcross v. CrabtreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Tufts v. NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re MayberryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Perkins v. BangsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Dalton-Ingersoll Co. v. FiskeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Conto v. SilviaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Robinson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.