Legal Opinion

Fry v. Lopez

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2019No. S-1-SC-34372; NO. S-1-SC-34386PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VIGIL, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

{1} In this case we revisit our statutory responsibility to ensure that the death penalty is reserved for the most heinous crimes. Since 1979, the New Mexico Legislature has directed this Court to ensure that "the death penalty shall not be imposed if ... the sentence of death is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases." NMSA 1978, § 31-20A-4(C)(4) (1979, repealed 2009).

{2} In 2009, the Legislature abolished the death penalty as a sentencing option for murders committed after July 1, 2009.1 Today, *1092Petitioners Robert Fry and Timothy…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. State v. BlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. WorleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State of Arizona v. Beau John GreeneArizona Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Richard Bernard Moore v. Bryan P. StirlingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API