Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Township of Charlevoix

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Charlevoix. (Ramsdell, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts .are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Plaintiff sued to recover back the taxes, •which he paid under protest, which were levied on his tug, •enrolled and licensed under the acts of Congress, and used at the time in the navigable waters of this State. The facts found by the court below show that plaintiff is not, and was not, a resident of Michigan, but of Dakota, and that he paid taxes there on this same property.

The decisions of the United States supreme court have uniformly held that a vessel enrolled and licensed or registered under the United States navigation laws does not, by engaging in business within a state, become…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Louis v. Ferry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Hays v. the Pacific Mail Steam-Ship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. Morgan v. ParhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. North Western Lumber Co. v. Chehalis CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Chicago, Duluth & Georgian Bay Transit Co. v. Corporation & Securities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Yost v. Lake Erie Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  4. Johnson v. DeBary-Baya Merchants' LineSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  5. Johnson v. DeBary-Baya Merchants' LineSupreme Court of Florida · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API