United States v. Don Tasy, United States of America v. Deb Tasy
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Circuit Judge.
Donald and Debbie Tasy (Don and Deb), husband and wife, appeal their convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 2314, Interstate Transportation of Stolen Property. The government failed to show that the defendants were a motivating cause in moving the goods in interstate commerce, and failed to establish the requisite jurisdictional nexus to interstate commerce. As such, we vacate and dismiss the convictions of Don and Deb Tasy for lack of federal jurisdiction.
I. Background
Deb Tasy owns D & D Forwarding, Inc. (D & D), a corporation located in Sioux City, Iowa. D & D is a trucking…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. RoselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. David Bruun and Ronald BerkovitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Harold Ray Amer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Ronald Henry Ludwig, United States of America v. Thomas James ColonnaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Robert % E. Anderson, A/ppellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Jerry Wade WainrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Jerry WainrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003