Legal Opinion

W.R. Grace & Co., Dearborn Division--Conn. v. Pierre Mouyal, Omnikem, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 28, 1992No. 91-8697PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

This diversity case involves the enforceability of a no-solicitation clause. In connection with his employment with plaintiff-appellant Dearborn Division of W.R. Grace & Co. — Conn. (“Dearborn”), defendant-ap-pellee Pierre Mouyal signed an employment contract containing a no-solicitation clause. For the eighteen-month period following Mouyal’s employment at Dearborn, the clause prohibited Mouyal from soliciting the Dearborn customers or prospects that he had contacted while employed at Dear-born. After leaving Dearborn, Mouyal joined a competing company and allegedly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Howard Schultz & Associates of Southeast, Inc. v. BroniecSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Uni-Worth Enterprises, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Fuller v. KolbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Reese M. Stidham, Iii, H. Paige Scarborough and John A. BrunerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Kirshbaum v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. W.R. Grace & Co., Dearborn Division--Conn. v. Pierre Mouyal, Omnikem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API