W.R. Grace & Co., Dearborn Division--Conn. v. Pierre Mouyal, Omnikem, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
This diversity case involves the enforceability of a no-solicitation clause. In connection with his employment with plaintiff-appellant Dearborn Division of W.R. Grace & Co. — Conn. (“Dearborn”), defendant-ap-pellee Pierre Mouyal signed an employment contract containing a no-solicitation clause. For the eighteen-month period following Mouyal’s employment at Dearborn, the clause prohibited Mouyal from soliciting the Dearborn customers or prospects that he had contacted while employed at Dear-born. After leaving Dearborn, Mouyal joined a competing company and allegedly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Howard Schultz & Associates of Southeast, Inc. v. BroniecSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Uni-Worth Enterprises, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Fuller v. KolbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Reese M. Stidham, Iii, H. Paige Scarborough and John A. BrunerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Kirshbaum v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- W.R. Grace & Co., Dearborn Division--Conn. v. Pierre Mouyal, Omnikem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994