Legal Opinion

Bank v. . Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

If an action had been brought by a taxpayer of the town of Oxford to enjoin the issue of bonds in payment of its subscription to the Oxford Coast Line Railroad Company, any final judgment upon the merits would have operated as an estoppel, both upon other taxpayers of the town and the municipality itself. 2 Black Judgments, sec. 584. In two actions brought by that company against the mayor and commissioners of Oxford, asking for mandamus to compel the issuing of a subscription of $40,000 in bonds to the capital stock of the company, in which a controversy arose, among other matters, as to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brenham v. German American BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Cain v. Commissioners of Davie CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Wood v. Town of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Southerland v. Board of Aldermen of GoldsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baillie Lumber Co. v. Kincaid Carolina Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Current v. . WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Clinard v. Town of KernersvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Union Bank of Richmond v. Board of Com'rsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1898
  5. Board of Com'rs v. Union Bank of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API