Public Service Commission v. City of Indianapolis
Indiana Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion
Emmert, J.
I concur in the result of the majority opinion, but not in all the reasoning by which it was accomplished. In an appeal from an order of the Commission fixing utility rates, we ought not have one standard for the trial court to consider the evidence when the utility takes the appeal, and another standard when a customer of the utility takes the appeal. Equal *102justice under law should give the same protection to the rate payer that it does the rate collector, and such a double standard for judicial review of rates cannot adequately protect the users of the utilities’…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon BoroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Public Service Commission v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Kosciusko County Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
- Opinion of Justices to House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.