Legal Opinion

Nye v. Clark

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Branch. (Pealer, J.) Bill to establish rights in highway. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Complainant filed his bill to establish his rights in a road in front of his premises, and to prevent obstructions and interference by defendants, who own property on the same road. Defendants defended on the ground that no such rights exist.

Complainant owns eighty acres on the town line between Ovid and Kinderhook in Branch county, being the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter and the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of section 31 in town seven south of range six west which is Ovid. Strong, owns land east of complainant in Ovid, and Clark and Jones own land in Kinderhook…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bumpus v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
  2. People v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crosby v. City of GreenvilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Lathrop v. ElsnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. McMorran Milling Co. v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Wayne County Savings Bank v. StockwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Village of Manchester v. ClarksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API