Legal Opinion

Clevy v. O'MEARA

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 12, 1959No. 43536PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Justice.

In the petitions of the above captioned suits the respective plaintiffs demanded wages for twelve hours’ work allegedly performed for the defendant on February 29, 1956. Additionally, they asked for penalties and attorneys’ fees under the provisions of LRS 23:631 and 632.

The trial court awarded $13.33 to Clevy and $12.68 to Wilson on the basis of six and one-half hours’ work by each during the day in question, but it rejected their demands for penalties and attorneys’ fees.

Plaintiffs appealed, and the defendant answered the appeals praying that the judgments be amended by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Deardorf v. HunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Bannon v. Techeland Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  3. Elliott v. General Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  4. Hazel v. Robinson & YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  5. Jefferson & Plaquemines Drainage District v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Carriere v. Pee Wee's Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Boudreaux v. Hamilton Medical GroupSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Harmon v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  4. Becker v. ChoateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Mitchell v. First National Life Insurance Co. of La.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1959

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API