Legal Opinion

United States v. Velasco

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 3, 1994No. 89 CR 71-3PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on Julio Velasco’s (“Velasco’s”) Objections to the Sup plemental Presentence Investigation Report (“Supplemental PSI”). Velasco objects on three grounds: 1) the Supplemental PSI improperly relies on a prior New York state conviction; 2) the court lacks jurisdiction to impose the mandatory minimum under 21 U.S.C. § 841; and 3) the Supplemental PSI erroneously assigns two criminal history points to Velasco for the New York offense. For the reasons stated below, Velasco’s objections are denied in part…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. WicksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. GaliczynskiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Burgos v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  3. United States v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API