Legal Opinion

Diamond v. Ruszkiewicz

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 18, 1997No. 96-1798PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, P.J.

Robert H. Diamond, Sr., Patrick J. Hudec and Historic Dining, Inc., appeal from a judgment dismissing their contribution claim against Barbara Ruszkiewicz and Fabian S. Ruszkiewicz. We conclude that the contribution claim is premature because neither Diamond, Hudec nor Historic Dining has paid anything on the underlying obligation. Accordingly, we affirm.

On December 1, 1993, the parties to this appeal signed a business note in the amount of $40,000. The maker of the note was Historic Dining; Diamond and Hudec are officers of the corporation. At the time the note was made, Diamond and Hudec…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Worden-Allen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. City of Racine v. J-T Enterprises of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Rosendale State Bank v. HollandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Felman v. Estate of BitkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sussex Tool & Supply, Inc. v. Mainline Sewer & Water, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API