Legal Opinion

State v. Diehl

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 2019No. WD-18-041PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Diehl,

2019-Ohio-3818.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WD-18-041 Appellee Trial Court No. 2012CR0145 v. Amanda Diehl, aka Ter Doest DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant Decided: September 20, 2019 ***** Paul A. Dobson, Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and David T. Harold, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Thomas P. Kurt, for appellant. ***** SINGER, J. {¶ 1} Appellant, Amanda Ter Doest, n.k.a. Diehl, appeals from the May 21, 2018 judgment of the Wood County Court of Common Pleas, which revoked…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. FraleyOhio Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RoseOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. Diehl (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. Ter DoestOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API