Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Cinco Federal Credit Union

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 19, 1985No. 83-3833PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeMASCIO, District Judge.

The debtor appeals an order of the bankruptcy judge denying confirmation of the debtor’s Chapter 13 plan. Under the terms of the debtor’s proposed plan, all allowed unsecured claims would be paid in full over a five-year period. The unsecured creditors, however, would receive no interest on their claims. In denying confirmation, the bankruptcy judge found that all unsecured claims would be paid in full if the debtor’s estate was liquidated. Upon this finding, the bankruptcy concluded that the “liquidation test” stated in 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(4) was not met. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  2. In Re MartinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  3. In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Cuyahoga County Welfare Dept.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985
  2. Robert W. Kelley, Cross-Appellees v. Metropolitan County Board of Education, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API