Legal Opinion

Purswell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1927No. 10770Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge. —

Appellant calls attention to a matter not discussed in our original opinion. He made affidavit to his motion for new trial in which he averred that the jury considered as a circumstance against him the fact that he did not testify as a witness. The affidavit of no juror or other person who could have knowledge of the fact, if it occurred, was attached to the motion. If any evidence was introduced or tendered upon the hearing to support the allegation it is not brought forward. It is apparent that the averment could not have been based on appellant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Crouchett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Noble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API