Legal Opinion

State v. Ratliff

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 27, 1991No. 91-0079PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trial court erred by sentencing the defendant to less than the mandatory minimum sentence required for a sale of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school. We reverse and remand for a resentencing to the mandatory minimum sentence. See State v. Vola, 591 So.2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). See also State v. Scates, 585 So.2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); State v. Baumgardner, 587 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); State v. Baxter, 581 So.2d 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

2ConcurrenceGunther, J.

ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., concur specially with opinions.

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BaxterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. State v. ScatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. State v. BaumgardnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. State v. VolaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TankelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992