Legal Opinion

Haney v. Holmes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 26, 1978No. 78-43Published

1Per curiam

Mary L. Haney, plaintiff below, seeks to appeal an order which states “the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be in [sic] the same is hereby granted.” This is not a final decision, order, judgment or decree within the contemplation of Flori*1189da Appellate Rule 3.2(b). Likewise, this case is not one which formerly would have been cognizable in equity, so the order is not subject to an interlocutory appeal. Fla. R.App.P. 4.2(a).

Therefore, we have no jurisdiction, and this appeal is hereby dismissed sua sponte. Rizzuto v. DiPaolo, 357 So.2d 490 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Arnold v. Brady, 178…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arnold v. BradyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  2. Rizzuto v. DiPaoloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API