Legal Opinion
Craver v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided March 14, 1953No. Claim No. 31674; Motion No. 2323; Claim No. 31675; Motion No. 2324; Claim No. 31674; Motion No. 2323-A; Claim No. 31674; Motion No. 2323-APublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lambíase, J.
The State of New York has moved in each of the above-entitled claims (Motions Nos. 2323, 2324) for an order dismissing the claim on the ground “ that the Court does not have jurisdiction of the subject ” and on the further ground “ that the claim does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the State of New York ”.
Claimants have brought on a cross motion (Motion No. 2323-A) pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 10, of the Court of Claims Act for an order permitting each of them to file a claim in the event that the motion of the State be upheld on the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Zabriskie v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Calvo v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Condon v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Kain v. . LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trzecieski v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956
- Rosenberg v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958