Legal Opinion

Pope v. Shipp

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1931No. 20453PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. '“Before one out of possession can maintain an action of trespass for cutting and removing standing timber, he must show himself to be the true owner.” Moore v. Vickers, 126 Ga. 42 (2) (54 S. E. 814).

2. In an action of trespass for the cutting and removal of certain kinds of timber situate upon a specified tract of land, as “oak, gum, and poplar,” *481the plaintiff does not show title to the timber thus in controversy merely by proof that he had sold to the defendant the “pine and cedar timber” upon the same tract, which the defendant had proceeded to cut and remove in accordance with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parker v. Waycross & Florida RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Bleckley v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Moore v. VickersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Gaskins v. Gray Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James v. Emmco Insurance Co. Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  2. Norman v. ChafinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API