Legal Opinion

Mims v. Hunt County

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 1981No. 20549PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARVER, Justice.

From a judgment granting a limited guardianship of the person and estate of Joe Allen Petty, Petty’s attorney, Christopher W. Mims, prosecutes this appeal in his own behalf complaining that the trial court failed to include in its judgment an award to Mims of an attorney’s fee against Hunt County, Texas. Mims contends that since Petty was unable to pay, Hunt County became ‘responsible’ for his fee under section 130G of the Probate Code (Vernon 1980). We affirm because Mims’ right to sue the county was conditioned that (and the record fails to show) Mims had first presented his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Petty v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Wade, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
  2. Mims v. Hunt CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API