Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Merrell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1933No. 23892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Section 8329, General Code, provides that when the sworn itemized statement required under Sections 8324 et seq., General Code, has been furnished to the principal contractor, if such principal contractor fails within five days after such receipt by him to notify in writing the owner, board or officer of his intention to dispute such claim, he shall be considered as assenting to its correctness. We have, therefore, under these pleadings, the truth of which is admitted for the purpose of ruling on this demurrer, a claim the correctness of which is not disputed by the principal contractor nor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Janes v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Williams v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Beifuss v. Westerville Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Lee Turzillo Contracting Co. v. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. City of Walla Walla v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Poenisch v. Kingsley-Dunbar, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API