Legal Opinion

Kelly v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund/Belt Public Schools

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1992No. 91-484 and 91-575PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

Claimant and appellant, Wayne V. Kelly (Kelly), appeals from two judgments of the Workers’ Compensation Court which ruled in favor of the insurer, State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund (the State Fund). We affirm.

FACTS

Kelly suffered three injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment while working as a bus driver for the Belt School District. Kelly injured his neck on May 14, 1986; his back on November 11, 1986; and his neck again on November 21, 1987. At the time of Kelly’s injuries, his employer was insured under Plan III of the Workers’ Compensation Act.

In addition to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Belton v. Carlson TransportMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Stangler v. Anderson Meyers Drilling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Nelson v. Semitool, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Davey v. NessanMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Lee v. Group W Cable TCI of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SykesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API