Legal Opinion

Kuzma v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 6, 1987No. Appeal, No. 2073 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Norma J. Kuzma (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which found her ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits under Sections 402(a) and 401(d)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law),1 43 PS. §§802(a) and 801(d)(1). The Boards finding of ineligibility was based on its conclusions that Claimant had failed to accept an offer of suitable employment and that she was not genuinely and realistically attached to the labor market.

Claimant was employed as a waitress by Country Foods Restaurant (Employer) until…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Shay Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Urista v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Breen v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Mohl v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scardina v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Shoemaker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. L. Whitehurst v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. M. Mirande v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API