Legal Opinion

Artrip v. J. S. Rasnake & Son

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided July 11, 1898PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Buchanan county pronounced October 3, 1896, in three chancery suits heard together, one under the style of J. H. Rasnake Son against Floyd Artrip and Alice Artrip, another under the style of M. 1. Browning against Floyd Artrip, and the other under the style of Alice Artrip against Floyd Artrip. The decree being adverse to the appellant, Alice Artrip, she appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

This is an appeal by Alice Artrip from a decree of the Circuit Court of Buchanan county rendered October 8, 1896, in the following named causes heard together: J. H. Rasnake & Son v. Floyd Artrip & Alice Artrip; M. T. Browning v. Floyd Artrip; and Alice Artrip v. Floyd Artrip.

In the first named cause, the bill, filed in August, 1895, alleges that Floyd Artrip and Alice, his wife, are indebted to the complainants for the purchase price of a stock of goods and merchandise sold by complainants to the defendants, ta the amount of $1,438.79, for which amount Floyd and Alice Artrip executed their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fishburne & Wife v. Ferguson's HeirsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  2. Stimpson v. BishopSupreme Court of Virginia · 1886
  3. Iaege v. BossieuxSupreme Court of Virginia · 1859

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Swan's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  2. C. B. Van Nostrand & Co. v. Virginia Zinc & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  3. Setliff v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  4. Hanna v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1846
  5. Brand v. GibsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API