Murdock v. Clarke
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Butte County granting a new trial. Motion to dismiss appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Motion is made to dismiss this appeal on the ground, among others, that the notice of appeal was not served as required by law.
*26Appellant’s attorneys resided, one at Quincy, Plumas County, the other at Alturas. Respondents’ counsel resided at Sacramento. The case was pending in Butte County, and was tried at Oroville in that county. There was regular communication by mail between Oroville and Sacramento; also between both Quincy and Alturas and Sacramento.
The notice of appeal was served by mail from Oroville.
The objection seems to be sustained by the case of Reed v. Allison, 61 Cal.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cunningham v. WarnekeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Reed v. AllisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Moore v. BesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by1 opinion
- Luck v. LuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890