Legal Opinion
Timenterial, Inc. v. Dagata
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided March 23, 1971No. File 166797PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmentano, J.
This is an action wherein the plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and damages for an alleged breach of a restrictive covenant in an employment contract wherein the defendant agreed not to “engage ... in any business venture having to do with the sale or rental of mobile homes or mobile offices in a fifty (50) mile radius from any existing Timenterial, Inc. sales lot” for a period of one year following the termination of his employment. The defendant terminated his employment about June 1, 1970, and has been engaged in the mobile home business, directly or indirectly, since about June 12, 1970,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Plumb v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- May v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Beit v. BeitSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Mattis v. LallySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co. v. City of BettendorfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Madrigal Audio Laboratories, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Cello, Ltd., and Mark Levinson, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- New Haven Tobacco Co. v. PerrelliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Dial Media, Inc. v. SchiffDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985
- James P. Larweth v. Magellan Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. McAndrewsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.