Legal Opinion

Benton v. David Allen Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 20, 1989No. A89A1526PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Chief Judge.

Appellee-defendant entered into a subcontract with Tyger Construction Company (Tyger) to install a brick sidewalk. The plans and specifications for the work to be done by appellee did not provide for the bricks in the sidewalk to be cemented into place. Instead, they provided for uncemented l-Vs’’-thick brick “pavers” merely to be laid in a compacted bed of sand. After appellee’s completion of the sidewalk, appellant-plaintiff tripped and fell while she was walking along it. Apparently, the uncemented “pavers” were subject to loosening when pressure was applied at their…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Young v. Smith & Kelly Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Powell v. Ledbetter Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Shetter v. Davis Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Bell & Son v. Kidd & RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. CW MATTHEWS CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC. v. MarascoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. David Allen Co. v. BentonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  2. Benton v. David Allen Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. David Allen Co. v. BentonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API