Legal Opinion

ROY v. SAUL

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 25, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00711Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TOKIN LYNN ROY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Civil Action No. 20-711 ANDREW M. SAUL, ) ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2021, upon consideration of the parties’ motions for summary judgment, the Court will grant the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) motion except as to costs.1 The findings in the Commissioner’s final decision denying Plaintiff’s application for benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”),

42 U.S.C. § 401

et seq., and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Kacee Chandler v. Commissioner Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API