Legal Opinion

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY v. Scott

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 15, 1986No. 85-1675, 85-2408 and 85-2728PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

481 So.2d 968 (1986)

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Petitioner,

v.

Mary M. SCOTT, Respondent.

Nos. 85-1675, 85-2408 and 85-2728.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 15, 1986.

Rehearing and/or Clarification Denied February 11, 1986.

Harry S. Raleigh of McCune, Hiaasen, Crum, Ferris & Gardner, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Montgomery, Lytal, Reiter, Denney & Searcy, P.A., and Barbara J. Compiani of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

2Per curiam

We sua sponte consolidate these actions and grant the petition for writ of certiorari in case No. 85-1675 and quash the…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Turtle Reef Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Airocar, Inc. v. GoldmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. State Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, Office of Child Support Enforcement ex rel. Whitman v. WhitmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Federal Exp. Corp. v. CantwayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Waste Management, Inc. v. SOUTHERN BELL TEL. AND TEL. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Marshalls of M.A., Inc. v. WitterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Millard Mall Services, Inc. v. BoldaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. Gelco Corp. v. Escambia CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API