Smith v. Eals
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Taylor District Court. — Hon. II. C. Hehby, Judge. This is an action of replevin to recover tbe possession of two accepted drafts. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Rothbock, 0. J.
bilí, of ex ' ‘ change: re-servedby constable. I. The drafts in question were drawn by Hall & Co., by Thomas E. Hall, upon the pls-íntilT, and payable to the order of Thomas E. Hall, and accepted by the plaintiff at the time they were drawn. Both instruments were dated January 8, 1889, and one was payable September 1, 1889, and the other *236December 1, 1889. After the instruments became due, they were sent by H. D. Booge & Co., of Topeka, Kansas, to tbe defendant Eals, a banker at Clearfield, Iowa, and the plaintiff commenced this action, and replevied the acceptances upon the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robinson v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Savery v. HaysSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Scofield v. FordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Sigler v. HidySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
3Cited by9 opinions
- New Orleans v. StempelSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Pritchard v. NorwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Conger v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Tharp v. JamisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Gregory v. Dr. J. W. S. Howell & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.