Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Co. v. Hackett
Wisconsin Supreme Court
'Appeal from, a judgment of the circuit court for Winnebago county: Chas. M. Webb, Judge. A suit by the Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Company against the city of Oshkosh and the Winnebago Traction Company to enjoin the latter from laying a second track on Main street in the city of Oshkosh and from interfering-with the Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Company in the laying of its tracks in said street, in which there were answer, cross-complaint, and counterclaim, .and…
Read the full summary
'Appeal from, a judgment of the circuit court for Winnebago county: Chas. M. Webb, Judge. A suit by the Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Company against the city of Oshkosh and the Winnebago Traction Company to enjoin the latter from laying a second track on Main street in the city of Oshkosh and from interfering-with the Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Company in the laying of its tracks in said street, in which there were answer, cross-complaint, and counterclaim, .and a suit by the city of Oshkosh against the Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Company and the Winnebago Traction Company…
1Opinion
The following opinion was filed May 8, 1908:
TiMiurr,- J.
Respondents move for a rehearing, finding error and obscurity in tlie former opinion, wbicb to tbe ap*502pellant appears “clear, comprehensive, and decisive.” So do our interests affect our judgments. ISTo new question affecting the merits is presented Try the motion; but .the earnestness, ability, and industry of respondents’ counsel deserve some attention beyond the mere formal denial of the motion. Perhaps counsel have not made sufficient allowance for the brevity, essential in judicial opinions, which constrains us to condense into about…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Co. v. Winnebago Traction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905