Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Maron v. Silver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 2008Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPeters, J.

As the majority notes, since this matter involves a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action (see CPLR 3211 [a] [7]), we must liberally construe the pleadings, grant petitioners the benefit of each favorable inference, and limit our review to a determination as to whether the facts they allege fall within a knowable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). Applying this standard of review, Supreme Court permitted petitioners’ separation of powers claim to proceed under two theories: (1) that the diminished actual value of their compensation impacted judicial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Kelch v. Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API