Legal Opinion
Frazier v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 29, 1973No. S-187PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellants were informed against, tried before a jury and convicted of grand larceny and of breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny. Following denial of a motion for new trial, they appealed.
Appellants (who will be referred to as defendants) contend the trial court committed error by admitting the testimony of an officer to an inculpatory statement made to him by one of the defendants, and claim prejudicial error because of their representation at trial by one attorney, a public defender.
In the City of Jacksonville at approximately 3:00 a. 1 m. on a certain date, a city…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Nelson v. O'NEILSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Solomon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Wethington v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Downer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- State v. EnriquezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987