Legal Opinion

Lawman v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1922No. 7 Div. 769Published

1Opinion

The earnest insistence of able counsel for this aged appellant, to the effect that it is clearly manifest from the proven facts in this case there was no intention upon the part of defendant to take the life of William Abbott, deceased, in the minor difficulty between these parties, must of necessity be answered by the well-known rule of law to the effect that the law presumes every person intends to do that which he does, and that the defendant must be presumed to have designed not only what he did, but also that the necessary and probable consequences of his acts were intended. McElroy v.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. McAllister v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  3. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Daughdrill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  5. Bowles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API