Smith ex rel. Hatcher v. Lyles
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge:
Before the court is the Chicago Housing Authority’s (“CHA”) motion to dismiss count V of the first amended complaint. For reasons stated below, the motion is denied. The court, however, strikes subparagraphs (d) and (e) of paragraph forty-one of the first amended complaint.
FACTS
The CHA is a municipal corporation authorized by the Housing Authorities Act, III. Rev.Stat. ch. 67$, ¶ 1 et seq., and established for the purpose of developing property that provides safe and sanitary housing in Chicago, Illinois. According to the complaint, CHA contracted with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Craig S. Strauss v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, and Chicago Police Officer John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Marie Ellsworth & Paul Ellsworth v. City of Racine, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Kevin Ross v. Creighton UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith Ex Rel. Hatcher v. LylesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Hightower v. HarrisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997