Legal Opinion

Smith ex rel. Hatcher v. Lyles

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 27, 1993No. 93 C 1316PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge:

Before the court is the Chicago Housing Authority’s (“CHA”) motion to dismiss count V of the first amended complaint. For reasons stated below, the motion is denied. The court, however, strikes subparagraphs (d) and (e) of paragraph forty-one of the first amended complaint.

FACTS

The CHA is a municipal corporation authorized by the Housing Authorities Act, III. Rev.Stat. ch. 67$, ¶ 1 et seq., and established for the purpose of developing property that provides safe and sanitary housing in Chicago, Illinois. According to the complaint, CHA contracted with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Craig S. Strauss v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, and Chicago Police Officer John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Marie Ellsworth & Paul Ellsworth v. City of Racine, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Kevin Ross v. Creighton UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith Ex Rel. Hatcher v. LylesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  2. Hightower v. HarrisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API