Legal Opinion

Stone v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 15, 1910PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Van Burén District Court. — Hon. M. A. Eoberts, Judge. Action ta recover damages for injuries to horses shipped by plaintiff from Ottumwa to East St. Louis over the lines of defendant road and connecting carrier. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and from judgment on such verdict the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.

The only ground of recovery alleged in plaintiff’s petition was the negligence of defendant in providing a defective car in which the horses were shipped, and it was alleged that six or seven head of horses shipped in said car were scratched, cut, and bruised, and in a bad, damaged, and unsalable condition and not marketable when the car arrived at its destination at East St. Louis. There was a conflict in the evidence as to the condition of the car in which the horses were shipped, and there*was evidence that, when the horses were examined in the sale barn of the consignee’s agent, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beard & Sons v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Volquardsen v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Betts v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. Powers v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Orr v. Des Moines Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  2. Kelly v. Muscatine, Burlington & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Glassman v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. McCoy v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Thompson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API