Legal Opinion

Atlantic Civil, Inc. v. Swift

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 24, 2013No. 3D12-1189PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

As a matter of law, the defendants’ unjustified and deliberate denial of access to what all agreed was the plaintiff appellant’s property, a large quantity of “fill” used in road construction, which had been stored on the appellee’s land by mutual agreement, constituted a conversion of that material which required the entry of a judgment in the appellant’s favor for its established value. See Thomas v. Hertz Corp., 890 So.2d 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Warshall v. Price, 629 So.2d 903 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Seymour v. Adams, 638 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). See also…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Warshall v. PriceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Seymour v. AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Thomas v. Hertz Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atlantic Civil v. Swift IIIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Atlantic Civil, Inc. v. Swift IIIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API