Atlantic Civil, Inc. v. Swift
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
As a matter of law, the defendants’ unjustified and deliberate denial of access to what all agreed was the plaintiff appellant’s property, a large quantity of “fill” used in road construction, which had been stored on the appellee’s land by mutual agreement, constituted a conversion of that material which required the entry of a judgment in the appellant’s favor for its established value. See Thomas v. Hertz Corp., 890 So.2d 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Warshall v. Price, 629 So.2d 903 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Seymour v. Adams, 638 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). See also…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Warshall v. PriceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Seymour v. AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Thomas v. Hertz Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
3Cited by2 opinions
- Atlantic Civil v. Swift IIIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Atlantic Civil, Inc. v. Swift IIIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017