Legal Opinion

People v. Middletown & Unionville Railroad

Middletown City Court

Decided December 12, 1938Published

1Opinion of the CourtFaulkner, J.

The defendants were charged by a factory inspector of the Labor Department of this State with having after due and proper notice violated subdivision 3 of section 161 of article 5 of chapter 50 of the Laws of 1921, commonly known as the Labor Law, in that they, being the proprietors of a factory located in Middletown, N. Y., wherein railroad equipment repairing and cleaning are done, permitted an employee, one J. E. Sanborn, to work therein on a Sunday, wiping and cleaning locomotives without having posted in a conspicuous place on the premises the schedule required by statute to be posted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schapp v. . BloomerNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. People v. Transit Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. Claim of Kast v. Lacona Sand & Gravel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API