Legal Opinion
State v. Bell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 6, 1975No. 1 CA-CR 665, 1 CA-CR 673PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.
This appeal requires an interpretation of Rule 32, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., dealing with post-conviction relief.
On December 20, 1973, appellants Roy S. Bell and Linda Jane Bell entered pleas of guilty to one amended charge each of unarmed robbery pursuant to a plea bargain whereby charges of possession of prescription only drugs for purposes of sale, not upon a valid prescription; possession of dangerous drugs for sale; second degree conspiracy; assisting the escape of prisoners; escape from county jail and armed robbery were dismissed as to…
2Cited by12 opinions
- State v. SchrockArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Joe Leonard Lambright v. Terry Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- State v. WattonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. AllenHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1987
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.