Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Emerson

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 10, 2015No. 2130842 and 2130974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Judge.

Rule 77(d), Ala. R. Civ. P., provides a procedure whereby a party claiming lack of timely notice of the entry of an appeal-able order or judgment may seek an extension of time to appeal. This case presents an unusual procedural scenario in which the Limestone Circuit Court (“the trial court”) granted George H. Johnson and Gloria J.- Johnson’relief ; pursuant to Rule 77(d) by, extending the time to appeal from a judgment permitting a writ ,of execution to be- issued against them in favor of Heath Emerson and Danny Adcock. This court docketed that appeal as appeal- no.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Asam v. DevereauxCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. United States v. Carroll Leppo, United States of America v. Leppo, CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Ex Parte S. Palmer KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Gotlieb v. CollatSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Ex Parte WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J.D. v. M.B.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  2. J.A. f/k/a J.A.H. v. C.G.H. and M.C.H .Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API