Legal Opinion

Amerada Petroleum Corporation, a Corporation v. John L. Burline

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1956No. 5152Published

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

Amerada Petroleum Corporation 1 brought this action against Burline, seeking a judgment requiring Burline to convey to Amerada five mineral interests which he had acquired in the Williston Basin in North Dakota, while an employee of Amerada. From an adverse judgment Amerada has appealed.

The findings of the trial court are supported by substantial evidence, are not clearly erroneous, and are therefore binding on this court. 2 *8

The facts, as reflected by such findings, follow:

For many years prior to the institution of the action, Amerada was and still is engaged in the oil…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blue Bell Co. v. Frontier Refining Co. Frontier Refining Co. v. Blue Bell Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  2. Ohio Oil Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  3. Hunter v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Pratt v. Shell Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  5. Harn v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API