Legal Opinion

State v. McBain

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 22, 1976No. 74-5657, CA 4854PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*739SCHWAB, C. J.

Upon trial by jury defendant was convicted of rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375. We reverse and remand on the ground that the trial judge permitted submission to the jury of identification evidence based upon an impermissibly suggestive procedure. Simmons v. United States, 390 US 377, 88 S Ct 967, 19 L Ed 2d 1247 (1968); United States v. Wade, 388 US 218, 87 S Ct 1926, 18 L Ed 2d 1149 (1967).1

The only direct identification was made by the prosecuting witness who testified that she had been raped by an unknown assailant in July of 1974, which was some ten months prior to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bankston v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. ClassenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State v. BushCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. RectorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. McBainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API