Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Baldwin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 2016Published

1Dissent

NeMoyer and Scudder, JJ.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent in part because, in our view, County Court properly determined that an upward departure from a presumptive level two risk was warranted under these facts. We therefore would modify the order only by vacating the determination that defendant is a sexually violent offender, in the interest of justice and on the law.

Here, as the court properly determined, there was an aggravating circumstance that is, “as a matter of law, of a kind or to a degree not adequately taken into account by the [Sex Offender Registration Act] guidelines”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. GillottiNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. People v. KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. People v. KotlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API