People v. Baldwin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
NeMoyer and Scudder, JJ.
(dissenting). We respectfully dissent in part because, in our view, County Court properly determined that an upward departure from a presumptive level two risk was warranted under these facts. We therefore would modify the order only by vacating the determination that defendant is a sexually violent offender, in the interest of justice and on the law.
Here, as the court properly determined, there was an aggravating circumstance that is, “as a matter of law, of a kind or to a degree not adequately taken into account by the [Sex Offender Registration Act] guidelines”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. GillottiNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. KotlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008